Phillips & Cohen LLP
Attorneys at Law
False Claims Act
Overview
How The Law Works
Common Types of Fraud
News Stories
Articles By The Firm
Qui Tam Statistics
The Statute
History of The Law
Resource Links


Qui tam news stories

Defense contractor fraud

There are many ways that a defense contractor can defraud the government. For instance, it could charge time it spends working on a commercial contract to a government contract, or it could build products for the government using cheaper products that the government hasn’t authorized and billing the government for the more expensive parts.

Here is a list of articles about some of the qui tam cases brought against defense contractors by attorneys Phillips & Cohen.

Northrop Grumman: Northrop Grumman paid $111.2 million to the federal government to settle a whistleblower lawsuit brought by Phillips & Cohen alleging that TRW Inc., which it acquired, billed the government for work done on non-government contracts and padded in other ways bills submitted to the government under space and technology contracts.

  • “Northrop to settle federal lawsuit; firm to pay $111.2 million to resolve overcharge claim,” Andy Pasztor and Anne Marie Squeo, The Wall Street Journal, 6/9/03.
  • “Northrop to pay $111 million to settle suit; subsidiary TRW allegedly overcharged U.S. on 1990s space project work,” Anitha Reddy, The Washington Post, 6/10/03.
  • “Northrop to pay $111 million in TRW suit,” Peter Pae, Los Angeles Times, 6/10/03.
  • “Whistleblower gets $27 million from company,” James Bernstein, Newsday, 6/10/03.
  • “Northrop settles federal TRW case; will pay $111m to end suit vs. unit,” Associated Press, Boston Globe, 6/10/03.
  • “Government joins whistleblower suit charging TRW with accounting fraud,” Federal Contracts Report, 2/23/98.
  • “Justice joins lawsuit accusing TRW of fraud,” Tim Smart, The Washington Post, 2/20/98.
  • “Civil fraud lawsuit against TRW Inc. over space contracts is joined by U.S.,” Andy Pasztor, The Wall Street Journal, 2/20/98.
  • “Justice Dept. to join suit against TRW,” Andrew Pollack, The New York Times, 2/20/98.
  • “Whistle-blower’s lawsuit alleges TRW unit defrauded government,” Elizabeth Douglass,   Los Angeles Times, 2/20/98.
  • “Lawsuit accuses TRW of fraud,” Marcus Gleisser, Plain Dealer, 2/20/98.
  • “Suit charges TRW defrauded government on space contracts,” Vago Muradian, Defense Daily, 2/20/98.

Return to top

Teledyne Inc.:Teledyne paid more than $115 million to settle two qui tam lawsuits brought by whistleblowers represented by Phillips & Cohen attorneys. One qui tam lawsuit said Teledyne’s Relays Division had falsely certified test results on certain sensitive electromagnetic parts that are used in weapons systems. A separate whistleblower lawsuit accused the company of padding estimates on sole source contracts.

  • “Teledyne to pay $112 million in two whistle‑blower suits,” Ralph Vartabedian, Los Angeles Times, 4/22/94.
  •   “Pentagon's contract ban for Teledyne; relays unit admits to faking test results,” New York Times, 4/14/93.
  • "Teledyne pleads guilty to charges it falsified tests," Jeff Cole, The Wall Street  Journal, 11/10/92.
  • “Teledyne, official accused of fraud; settlement offered,” Ron Russell, Los Angeles Times, 10/3/92.
  • "Maker is accused of faulty tests on parts for missiles and aircraft," Richard Stevenson, The New York Times, 4/23/92.
  • “U.S. joins suit alleging Teledyne falsified tests,” Henry Weinstein, Los Angeles Times, 4/23/92.
  • “U.S. joins suit over Teledyne's testing results," Jeff Cole, The Wall Street Journal, 4/23/92.
  • "Justice Dept. joins fraud suit against Teledyne," Steven Pearlstein, The Washington Post, 4/23/92.
  • “Justice Dept. joins Teledyne suit filed by whistle‑blower,” Ralph Vartabedian, Los Angeles Times, 11/29/90.
  • "Teledyne target of whistle‑blower suit," Russ Britt, The Wall Street Journal, 10/29/90.
  • "U.S. joins lawsuit by whistle‑blower against Teledyne," The Wall Street Journal, 10/29/90.

Return to top

General Electric Co. Inc.: GE paid $59.5 million to settle a whistleblower lawsuit that alleged GE executives and an Israeli general conspired to divert U.S. military aid money intended for the Israeli Air Force.

  • “Portrait of a whistleblower,” Liz Doup, The Miami Herald, 1/17/93.
  • "GE whistleblower receives record $13.4 million award," John Mintz, The Washington Post, 12/5/92.
  • "Whistleblower in GE scandal gets $13 million," Jonathan Peterson, Los Angeles Times, 12/5/92.
  • "GE whistleblower is awarded $13.4 million," Calvin Sims, The New York Times, 12/5/92.
  • "Whistleblower gets $13 million award," Gary Rhodes, The Washington Post, 12/5/92.
  • “Federal judge awards ex-GE staffer record amount in whistleblower case,” Amal Kumar Naj, The Wall Street Journal, 12/7/92.
  • “GE guilty plea in U.S. aid to Israel,” Richard W. Stevenson, The New York Times, 7/23/92.
  • “General Electric pleads guilty, pays $69 million to settle whistleblower suit,” Amal Kumar Naj, The Wall Street Journal, 7/23/92.
  • “GE’s drive to purge fraud is hampered by worker’s mistrust,” Amal Kumar Naj, The Wall Street Journal, 7/23/92.
  • "GE Threatens to Fire, Sue Worker Who Told of Israeli Scheme," Steven Pearlstein, The Washington Post, 3/18/92.
  • "U.S. accuses GE of fraud in Israeli deal," Richard Stevenson, The New York Times, 8/15/91.
  • "U.S. joins suit against General Electric officials," Amal Kumar Naj, The Wall Street Journal, 8/15/91.
  • "U.S. broadens fraud action against GE," Amal Kumar Naj, The Wall Street Journal, 3/17/91.

Return to top

Singer Co.: Singer and CAE Inc. paid $50 million to settle a whistleblower lawsuit that charged Singer’s Link Flight Simulation Division (later sold to CAE) routinely and systematically submitted false cost and pricing data to the Department of Defense on sole-source fixed-price, negotiated contracts.

  • “Whistleblower collects $7.5 million for his tip,” Richard W. Stevenson, The New York Times, 7/19/92.
  • “U.S. judge orders $7.5 million award to whistleblower,” Richard W. Stevenson, The New York Times, 7/15/92.
  • “Fraud suit is settled for $55.5 million,” Henry Weinstein, Los Angeles Times, 7/15/92.
  • “Singer Corp. successor firm is expected to be charged in Pentagon fraud case,” Andy Pasztor, The Wall Street Journal, 7/9/92.
  • “Singer case whistleblower says decision was difficult,” James Hirsch, The New York Times, 3/16/89.
  • “U.S. sues singer on contracts,” Jeff Gerth, The New York Times, 3/15/89.
  • “U.S. joins lawsuit against Singer Co. over job claims,” Laurie P. Cohen, The Wall Street Journal, 3/15/89.

Return to top

Allegheny Teledyne Inc.: Allegheny Teledyne  paid $13.95 million to settle a qui tam case involving issues as to whether Teledyne Systems Co., a corporate predecessor, was properly allocating between the government and commercial customers indirect costs relating to calibration services.

  • “Teledyne units settle ’95 suit for $14 million,” Karen Kaplan, Los Angeles Times, 11/13/97.
  • “Teledyne ponies up, settles suit,” Len Boselovic, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 11/13/97.
  • “Allegheny Teledyne to pay up,” Deborah Adamson, Daily News, 11/13/97.

Return to top

FMC Corp.:The company agreed to pay more than $13 million to settle a whistleblower lawsuit alleging that it had inflated its research costs under a Pentagon contract to build the Bradley combat vehicle.

  • “Whistleblowing hits chord; former FMC Corp. employee to receive $2.86 million in settlement,” Vincent J. Schodolski, Chicago Tribune, 10/23/96.
  • “FMC to pay $13m settlement,” Barbara Starr, Jane’s Defence Weekly, 10/16/96.
  • “FMC to pay $13 million in whistleblower settlement,” Los Angeles Times, 10/9/96.
  • “FMC Corp. settles government’s suit on overpricing,” Andy Pasztor, The Wall Street Journal, 10/9/96.
  • “FMC to pay U.S. in Army contract dispute,” New York Times, 10/9/96.
  • “Defense contractor FMC to pay U.S. $13 million,” Seth Rosenfeld, San Francisco Examiner, 10/9/96.
  • “S.J. defense firm to pay $13 million,” Harriet Chiang, San Francisco Chronicle, 10/9/96.
  • “FMC pays $13 million to settle U.S. claims,” Chicago Sun-Times, 10/9/96.
  • “FMC to pay U.S. over suit,” Janet Rae-Dupree, San Jose Mercury News, 10/9/96.

Return to top

Hughes Aircraft: Hughes paid $4.5 million to settle a whistleblower lawsuit accusing it of falsifying quality-control tests of electronic parts used in various weapons.

  • “Hughes Aircraft pays $4.5 million to settle false-testing lawsuit,” Andy Pasztor, The Wall Street Journal, 9/11/96.
  • “Two Hughes whistle-blowers to split $891,000,” Henry Weinstein, Los Angeles Times, 9/11/96.
  • “Hughes whistle-blowers share $891,000 from suit,” Andre Mouchard, The Orange County Register, 9/11/96.
  • “Hughes pays $4 million to settle 1990 whistleblower suit,” Vago Muradian, Defense Daily, 9/11/96.
  • “Hughes to pay U.S. $4.05 million to settle lawsuit,” Dori Meinert, San Diego Union-Tribune, 9/11/96.

Return to top

The Boeing Co.: A whistleblower lawsuit brought by Phillips & Cohen attorneys, and joined by the government, charged the company failed to properly install a part, known as a “fuzz buster,” on the Apache attack helicopter that prevents unnecessary maintenance stops — costing the U.S. Army more than $20 million dollars for aborted missions, unnecessary maintenance and lost training time.

  • “Justice seeking $20 million from Boeing for faulty Apache safety system,” Defense Daily, 6/26/00.
  • “U.S. sues Boeing over alarm wiring on Army copters,” Andy Pasztor, The Wall Street Journal, 6/23/00.
  • “U.S. joins $20 mil suit vs. Boeing,” Riccardo A. Davis, The Arizona Republic, 6/23/00.
  • “U.S. joins suit against Boeing over Apache helicopter part,” Seattle Times, 6/23/00.
  • “Government joins a whistleblower suit vs. Boeing,” Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 6/23/00.

Return to top


About the Firm : False Claims Act : Do You Have A Case? : Whistleblower Rewards & Stories : News & Settlements : State False Claims Laws : Contact Information : Site Map : Search : Privacy : Case Evaluation Forms : Home

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.

Copyright © by Phillips & Cohen LLP. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement.